Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04341
Original file (BC 2013 04341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04341

		COUNSEL: NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C with narrative reason for separation of “unsatisfactory performance,” be changed to give her an opportunity to reenter the military. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While in the service, she never received any non-judicial punishment or got in any trouble.  She was discharged for washing out of technical school and told she could reenter the military after 24 months. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 6 Jul 04.

On 10 Mar 05, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s discharge. 

On 21 Mar 05 the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge under the provisions of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, Chapter 5, Section E, Paragraph 5.26.3, Unsatisfactory Performance for failure to progress in on-the-job training, and was credited with 8 months and 16 days of active service. 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  The applicant received an RE code of 2C--"Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service" based on her involuntary discharge with honorable character of service.  On 10 Mar 2005, the 81 TRG/CC directed applicant be discharge for unsatisfactory performance with an honorable character of service. The RE code 2C is the correct RE code based on applicant's involuntary discharge with honorable character of service.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:

After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely.  Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction    36-2603.  Applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits.  Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness.  It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04341 in Executive Session on 31 Jul 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Sep 13.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPOSA, dated 23 Oct 13.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Jan 14




                                   

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03479

    Original file (BC 2014 03479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 Aug 07, she was discharged with a narrative reason for separation of “Erroneous entry (other)” and a RE code of “2C.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s requests to change her separation and RE codes. It has been seven years since she was discharged from the service and she did not provide a reason why the application was not submitted within three years of her discharge. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02702

    Original file (BC 2014 02702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s record documents her commander notified her he was recommending her for discharge for “Entry Level Performance or Conduct” - failure to make satisfactory progress in a required training program (not for pregnancy, as the applicant contends) on 17 Aug 90 and that the applicant acknowledged receipt of this notification by placing her signature on the memorandum which is also dated 17 Aug 90. Additionally, there is documentation in the record to show that the base separations...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03960

    Original file (BC 2013 03960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 25 Sep 13, AFPC/DPSIRP notified the applicant that her request to change her surname was not possible because changes to former service members records are only permitted when there is evidence the data was erroneously recorded by the Air Force. The applicant has been disqualified for continued military service due to fitness failures and had a potentially disqualifying medical condition involving her left foot; both which could result in a 2C RE code. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00521

    Original file (BC-2012-00521.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Jun 11, the applicant’s commander notified her of his intent to recommend her discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory performance, specifically failure to progress in required military training. First, the RE code the applicant requests, R1, does not exist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02040

    Original file (BC 2013 02040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02040 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry Code 3A, which denotes “Failure to Complete Course of Instruction,” be changed to 1A, which denotes “Ineligible to Reenlist, but Condition Waived,” to allow reenlistment in the Armed Forces. On 22 Mar 2013, the applicant was notified by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05343

    Original file (BC 2013 05343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05343 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Re-enlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow her to reenter the military. On 5 Jun 08, after receiving two...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00351

    Original file (BC-2012-00351.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The four test failures were evidence of her lack of motivation. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While it is true she was counseled multiple times for her failures, she would like to make it clear that her academic deficiencies are not because of her lack of motivation. She failed this course, but it does not mean she would fail out of every course of study in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01872

    Original file (BC-2010-01872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01872 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge or uncharacterized entry level separation) be changed to a code that will allow her to reenlist. The applicant was discharged with an honorable discharge for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00953

    Original file (BC-2011-00953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00953 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His “2C” reentry (RE) code (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed. DPSOS states the applicant was discharged for unsatisfactory progress in training based upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02363

    Original file (BC-2011-02363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02363 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected as follows: 1. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and...